
In the Introduction, Assagioli compares and contrasts Psychosynthesis with existential psychology. In the amazing plethora of psychologies, methods, protocols and techniques offered today, what makes Psychosynthesis stand out? How is it similar and how is it different?
In chapter one, subtitled, "Dynamic Psychology and Psychosynthesis," he lists a large number of influences and strands in the stream of psychology of the day. He says that in attempting to coordinate and synthesize these, one can arrive at "a pluridimensional conception of the human personality." From there he presents his famous schematic, the egg diagram, in which he presents his idea of the psychological structure of the human person.
At the same time, Assagioli makes it very clear that Psychosynthesis is not a 'one-size fits all' psychotherapy. He writes of the dynamism of the concrete real living person. He emphasizes that the Self is 'one,' and states that the small self of ordinary consciousness is but a 'reflection' of the Self. However, the problem is that humans experience themselves as divided in many ways, ..."we are limited and bound in a thousand ways - the prey of illusions and phantasms, the slaves of unrecognized complexes, tossed hither and thither by external influences, blinded and hypnotized by deceiving appearances."
Then, we are offered a way out: achieve a "harmonious inner integration, true Self-realization and right relationships with others. This is accomplished through the stages of psychosynthesis, which Assagioli lists. He describes what is to be done in each stage.
I'm wondering, what has been our own experience with each of these stages? And, what have we learned through observing and assisting others to through them?